THE
ORDAINED MINISTER'S
COMPLIANCE PACK
Only $ 99.99
Clients in the past have paid us over $ 5,000 for this information
AUTHORED BY A “RETIRED” CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT AND FORMER INTERNAL REVENUE FIELD AGENT
COMPLIANCE PACK MEMBER ONE:
1. ORDAINED MINISTERS AND TAXATION-THE TRUTH
" THE-COMPENSATION PACKAGE PROGRAM"
Only One Of Its Kind…..
MINISTER'S COMPLIANCE PACK
OVER 300 PAGES WITH APPROPRIATE FORMS FOR THE ORDAINED MINISTER'S COMPENSATION PACKAGE PROGRAM
IT’S TIME WE GET OUR ‘HOUSE’ IN ORDER…..
Learn:
-How to define your dual financial roles and financially account for them;
-How to establish your compensation package (a must);
-How to elect out of Social Security on your ministerial income;
-How to organize your taxes;
-What Internal Revenue Service Form 211 means to you?
--Why the ministerial housing allowance, properly applied, is the single greatest tax shelter available to anyone. This is only available to ministers.
--How the minister can take advantage of the unique opportunity for clergy to opt out of paying Social Security taxes, without jeopardizing their Social Security benefits at retirement;
--The major part of the income received by a minister can be exempted from taxation;
--How to shelter love offerings and other income through a compensation package correctly authorized by the board of directors.
THIS IS INCLUDED IN THE PACK;
THE-ORDAINED-MINISTER’S COMPENSATION PACKAGE BOOK:
VALUED AT $ 2,500.00
Minister's 600K Compensation Package Challenged in Court
According to a recent court case, the church community received some disturbing comments. The writers asserts, “It's hardly a secret that organized religion can be a very lucrative business model, but the sky high compensation package offered to the new senior minister of Riverside Church—which has a long history of advocating social justice—has some congregants raising hell.” The Daily News's Juan Gonzalez reports that a group of dissident church members filed suit in Manhattan Supreme Court last week to stop Saturday's installation of Rev. Brad Braxton, who's been hired with a $600,000 annual compensation package.
WHY IS THE ORDAINED MINISTER TAXED?
As mentioned above, the very first sentence of the United States’ constitution states, “Congress shall make no law regarding an establishment of religion.” In its simple format, no law means any law. Under the true essence of the law, Christian Churches do not need to obtain a special “operating license” to avoid taxation; the United States government simply cannot tax the Church in the first place. The Church is forbidden by Scripture from merging with the State because the two exist as separate entities. By constitutional law, the State is not to claim jurisdiction over the Church, and the Church is not to place herself in such a position of subordination to the State. The true Church simply does not need to obtain the State’s permission to exist as a legal entity; the Church’s charter is the Bible, and her articles of incorporation are the commandments of God. Therefore, how did the government get around this concept of separation of Church and State in order to tax the ministers?
The answer is that most Churches in America have incorporated, and many have gone to the added expense of applying for and obtaining tax-exempt status from the Internal Revenue Service under Title 26, United States Code, Section 501(c)(3). So what exactly is incorporation to the Church? What really happens to the Church or denomination that incorporates? First of all, let me define the word “corporation.” In the strict definition of the word, a corporation is “a group of people combined into or acting as one body, according to the American Heritage Dictionary. The Christian doctrine of “incorporation” is sacramental. It is the church on earth, and that makes her one “body,” one “corpus,” incorporated into Christ and into one another. The Church as a sacramental corporation has given a perspective of continuity to men, and thus man has analogously set up other corporations that provide continuity for their works. The Church is already a true corporation. She is so by virtue of the sacramental presence of Christ’s body in her midst and at her heart. The Church does not need to “obtain incorporation” from any earthly power.
Recently, the General Accounting Office, an investigative division of the government reported to congress that exempt organizations are shorting the United States treasury by more than twenty billion dollars per year. The authorizing agency stated, “although United States taxpayer contribute billions of dollars to support charitable causes, many of those very same charities are dipping deeper into the pockets of Americans by chiseling on their own taxes.” Auditors at the Government accountability office told lawmakers that charities and other tax-exempt organization were shortchanging the Treasury to the tune of nearly $ 1 billion by neglecting to make payroll tax payments or pay other taxes required by the government. Additionally, the government probe supposedly uncovered even more troubling issues, including abusive and potentially criminal activity by 501(c) (3) organizations. Some officials at the exempted organization studies by the General Accounting Office diverted the money to fund their operations, including paying themselves salaries ranging from hundreds of thousands of dollars to over $ 1 million. This shows the climate that exists today for Church. Therefore, the Church must make sure its house is in order.
2. COMPLIANCE PACK MEMBER TWO:
"THE CHURCH AND MINISTERS UNDER ATTACK-BE AWARE"
VALUED AT $ 1,500.00
Analysis of the Bishop Anthony and Harriet Jinwright’s Fraud Case
“Bishop Anthony Jinwright, the 54-year-old Greater Salem Church pastor who lived lavishly while his west Charlotte church struggled to pay its bills, was sentenced to eight years and nine months in federal prison for conspiracy and tax evasion. His wife and co-pastor, Harriet Jinwright, 51, was sentenced to six years and eight months. (There is nothing wrong with a lavish living style if structured correctly by the ordained minister). Under federal law, each must serve at least 85 percent of that time behind bars.” (Correctly structured under our system, this would not have happen).
“U.S. District Judge Frank Whitney issued the ruling about 10 p.m. Thursday, December 10, 2010 after a grueling, two-day marathon that included more than 20 hours of testimony, character witnesses and sometimes-contentious wrangling between opposing lawyers.”(Is this a farther intent that the government has a master plan to tax non-profit organizations)(This new source of revenue would help reduce the budget deficit according to the General Accounting Office)
In the end, Whitney said, the case was not about “faith or religion,” “was not an attack on individuals or a community’s beliefs,” “was not about race” and was not about “individual gifts by loving people” to their pastors.( How can this be when the there a special rules and statutes for ordained ministers of the gospel). “This case is about income from an employer to an employee,” he said. (For social security and Medicare taxes a minister is considered self-employed, interesting statement by the judge).”
3. COMPLIANCE PACK MEMBER THREE
UNDERSTANDING THE IRS FORM 211-INFORMANT FORM
INFORMATION WAS VALUED AT
$ 1,200.00
SPECIAL REPORT: HOW INFORMANTS MAKE MONEY WITH THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
When I worked with the Internal Revenue Service as a Field agent, I can recall a specific informant’s case I worked on. Unfortunately, this person had not reported all of his income as well as the income from his corporation. A close associate, a friend reported the situation to the Service. When everything was said and done, this person served three years in prison and had civil penalties of over $ 2,000,000.00. Now the informant, who happens to be his friend, received $ 150,000 as an award from the Internal Revenue Service. Do not let this happen to you.
Since the church and the ministers are the last untaxed entities under the tax laws, the lawmakers have devised alternative ways to tax the church as well as its ministers. When I was in training with the Internal Revenue Service to be an agent whenever we came to the sections on ministers and church taxations, the instructors always told us do not concern yourselves with this areas of the tax law. During this time, if you assigned an examination of this type of return it was the rule to just survey it. Unfortunately, the climate has changed, for instance, in the last five years we have seen more than ten thousands cases in litigation with the Internal Revenue Service concerning churches and/or their ministers.
Therefore, the government has restructure the law, in order to allow a tool which is know as Form 211 to serve as a monitor vehicle in the enforcement and watchdog avenue in order to control the church as well as its ministers.
The U.S. Justice Department has long relied on whistleblower actions to safeguard the integrity of public expenditures, with well-publicized and increasingly large recoveries the result. In contrast, the Internal Revenue Service has historically been hesitant to make use of whistleblowers, who have thus had commensurately limited effect on revenue collection. This historical contrast in approach to policing the public interest, however, has rapidly changed. The False Claims Act, which is enforced by the Department of Justice, permits whistleblowers to file suits (called qui tams) on behalf of the United States against those who defraud the government, then allows whistleblowers to share in the resultant recoveries. (1) In 1986, Congress amended the False Claims Act to enhance the incentives for whistleblowers to file qui tams. The amended Act provides for treble damages and penalties of up to $11,000 per false claim. (2) Qualifying whistleblowers can receive up to a maximum of 30 percent of the government's recovery, depending on whether the United States takes over prosecution of a case.
Since 1954, the IRS has had its own statutory authorization to pay rewards to promote whistle-blowing. The component of the program most familiar to citizenry today is the Form 211 procedures, which is outlined in Revenue Publication 733. Pursuant to this procedure, whistleblowers who have reported underpayments of tax to the IRS may subsequently receive as reward potentially amounting to 30 percent of the amount recovered by submitting a completed Application for Reward for Original Information (Form 211), to the local IRS campus, referencing both the subject taxpayer and the information that was provided regarding the taxpayer.
Under the old system, the Form 211 procedure has had limited effect, owing in substantial measure to the historically low cap on rewards ($2 million), the absence of any provisions allowing whistleblowers to enforce their claims to rewards, and limited promotion of the program. Thus, while recoveries by the United States in whistleblower cases under the False Claims Act have been increasing exponentially since the Act was amended in 1986 (from $390,000 in 1987 to over $1.1 billion in 2005), recoveries by the IRS under its whistleblower program in recent years have not even reached $100 million (including taxes, penalties, and interest). Therefore, partly because of this disparity in numbers, the IRS has been under increasing pressure to restructure its whistleblower incentive program. In 2004, Senator Charles Grassley, Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, who was a key sponsor of the 1986 False Claims Act Amendments, proposed revisions to section 7623 of the internal Revenue Code that would have created a whistleblower framework similar in key respects to the False Claims Act. The legislation was not enacted in 2004, but the IRS had already taken notice.
FOR LIMITED TIME ONLY
YOUR
BARGAIN PRICE
$ 99.99
ORDAINED MINISTER'S
COMPLIANCE PACK
Only $ 99.99
Clients in the past have paid us over $ 5,000 for this information
AUTHORED BY A “RETIRED” CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT AND FORMER INTERNAL REVENUE FIELD AGENT
COMPLIANCE PACK MEMBER ONE:
1. ORDAINED MINISTERS AND TAXATION-THE TRUTH
" THE-COMPENSATION PACKAGE PROGRAM"
Only One Of Its Kind…..
MINISTER'S COMPLIANCE PACK
OVER 300 PAGES WITH APPROPRIATE FORMS FOR THE ORDAINED MINISTER'S COMPENSATION PACKAGE PROGRAM
IT’S TIME WE GET OUR ‘HOUSE’ IN ORDER…..
Learn:
-How to define your dual financial roles and financially account for them;
-How to establish your compensation package (a must);
-How to elect out of Social Security on your ministerial income;
-How to organize your taxes;
-What Internal Revenue Service Form 211 means to you?
--Why the ministerial housing allowance, properly applied, is the single greatest tax shelter available to anyone. This is only available to ministers.
--How the minister can take advantage of the unique opportunity for clergy to opt out of paying Social Security taxes, without jeopardizing their Social Security benefits at retirement;
--The major part of the income received by a minister can be exempted from taxation;
--How to shelter love offerings and other income through a compensation package correctly authorized by the board of directors.
THIS IS INCLUDED IN THE PACK;
THE-ORDAINED-MINISTER’S COMPENSATION PACKAGE BOOK:
VALUED AT $ 2,500.00
Minister's 600K Compensation Package Challenged in Court
According to a recent court case, the church community received some disturbing comments. The writers asserts, “It's hardly a secret that organized religion can be a very lucrative business model, but the sky high compensation package offered to the new senior minister of Riverside Church—which has a long history of advocating social justice—has some congregants raising hell.” The Daily News's Juan Gonzalez reports that a group of dissident church members filed suit in Manhattan Supreme Court last week to stop Saturday's installation of Rev. Brad Braxton, who's been hired with a $600,000 annual compensation package.
WHY IS THE ORDAINED MINISTER TAXED?
As mentioned above, the very first sentence of the United States’ constitution states, “Congress shall make no law regarding an establishment of religion.” In its simple format, no law means any law. Under the true essence of the law, Christian Churches do not need to obtain a special “operating license” to avoid taxation; the United States government simply cannot tax the Church in the first place. The Church is forbidden by Scripture from merging with the State because the two exist as separate entities. By constitutional law, the State is not to claim jurisdiction over the Church, and the Church is not to place herself in such a position of subordination to the State. The true Church simply does not need to obtain the State’s permission to exist as a legal entity; the Church’s charter is the Bible, and her articles of incorporation are the commandments of God. Therefore, how did the government get around this concept of separation of Church and State in order to tax the ministers?
The answer is that most Churches in America have incorporated, and many have gone to the added expense of applying for and obtaining tax-exempt status from the Internal Revenue Service under Title 26, United States Code, Section 501(c)(3). So what exactly is incorporation to the Church? What really happens to the Church or denomination that incorporates? First of all, let me define the word “corporation.” In the strict definition of the word, a corporation is “a group of people combined into or acting as one body, according to the American Heritage Dictionary. The Christian doctrine of “incorporation” is sacramental. It is the church on earth, and that makes her one “body,” one “corpus,” incorporated into Christ and into one another. The Church as a sacramental corporation has given a perspective of continuity to men, and thus man has analogously set up other corporations that provide continuity for their works. The Church is already a true corporation. She is so by virtue of the sacramental presence of Christ’s body in her midst and at her heart. The Church does not need to “obtain incorporation” from any earthly power.
Recently, the General Accounting Office, an investigative division of the government reported to congress that exempt organizations are shorting the United States treasury by more than twenty billion dollars per year. The authorizing agency stated, “although United States taxpayer contribute billions of dollars to support charitable causes, many of those very same charities are dipping deeper into the pockets of Americans by chiseling on their own taxes.” Auditors at the Government accountability office told lawmakers that charities and other tax-exempt organization were shortchanging the Treasury to the tune of nearly $ 1 billion by neglecting to make payroll tax payments or pay other taxes required by the government. Additionally, the government probe supposedly uncovered even more troubling issues, including abusive and potentially criminal activity by 501(c) (3) organizations. Some officials at the exempted organization studies by the General Accounting Office diverted the money to fund their operations, including paying themselves salaries ranging from hundreds of thousands of dollars to over $ 1 million. This shows the climate that exists today for Church. Therefore, the Church must make sure its house is in order.
2. COMPLIANCE PACK MEMBER TWO:
"THE CHURCH AND MINISTERS UNDER ATTACK-BE AWARE"
VALUED AT $ 1,500.00
Analysis of the Bishop Anthony and Harriet Jinwright’s Fraud Case
“Bishop Anthony Jinwright, the 54-year-old Greater Salem Church pastor who lived lavishly while his west Charlotte church struggled to pay its bills, was sentenced to eight years and nine months in federal prison for conspiracy and tax evasion. His wife and co-pastor, Harriet Jinwright, 51, was sentenced to six years and eight months. (There is nothing wrong with a lavish living style if structured correctly by the ordained minister). Under federal law, each must serve at least 85 percent of that time behind bars.” (Correctly structured under our system, this would not have happen).
“U.S. District Judge Frank Whitney issued the ruling about 10 p.m. Thursday, December 10, 2010 after a grueling, two-day marathon that included more than 20 hours of testimony, character witnesses and sometimes-contentious wrangling between opposing lawyers.”(Is this a farther intent that the government has a master plan to tax non-profit organizations)(This new source of revenue would help reduce the budget deficit according to the General Accounting Office)
In the end, Whitney said, the case was not about “faith or religion,” “was not an attack on individuals or a community’s beliefs,” “was not about race” and was not about “individual gifts by loving people” to their pastors.( How can this be when the there a special rules and statutes for ordained ministers of the gospel). “This case is about income from an employer to an employee,” he said. (For social security and Medicare taxes a minister is considered self-employed, interesting statement by the judge).”
3. COMPLIANCE PACK MEMBER THREE
UNDERSTANDING THE IRS FORM 211-INFORMANT FORM
INFORMATION WAS VALUED AT
$ 1,200.00
SPECIAL REPORT: HOW INFORMANTS MAKE MONEY WITH THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
When I worked with the Internal Revenue Service as a Field agent, I can recall a specific informant’s case I worked on. Unfortunately, this person had not reported all of his income as well as the income from his corporation. A close associate, a friend reported the situation to the Service. When everything was said and done, this person served three years in prison and had civil penalties of over $ 2,000,000.00. Now the informant, who happens to be his friend, received $ 150,000 as an award from the Internal Revenue Service. Do not let this happen to you.
Since the church and the ministers are the last untaxed entities under the tax laws, the lawmakers have devised alternative ways to tax the church as well as its ministers. When I was in training with the Internal Revenue Service to be an agent whenever we came to the sections on ministers and church taxations, the instructors always told us do not concern yourselves with this areas of the tax law. During this time, if you assigned an examination of this type of return it was the rule to just survey it. Unfortunately, the climate has changed, for instance, in the last five years we have seen more than ten thousands cases in litigation with the Internal Revenue Service concerning churches and/or their ministers.
Therefore, the government has restructure the law, in order to allow a tool which is know as Form 211 to serve as a monitor vehicle in the enforcement and watchdog avenue in order to control the church as well as its ministers.
The U.S. Justice Department has long relied on whistleblower actions to safeguard the integrity of public expenditures, with well-publicized and increasingly large recoveries the result. In contrast, the Internal Revenue Service has historically been hesitant to make use of whistleblowers, who have thus had commensurately limited effect on revenue collection. This historical contrast in approach to policing the public interest, however, has rapidly changed. The False Claims Act, which is enforced by the Department of Justice, permits whistleblowers to file suits (called qui tams) on behalf of the United States against those who defraud the government, then allows whistleblowers to share in the resultant recoveries. (1) In 1986, Congress amended the False Claims Act to enhance the incentives for whistleblowers to file qui tams. The amended Act provides for treble damages and penalties of up to $11,000 per false claim. (2) Qualifying whistleblowers can receive up to a maximum of 30 percent of the government's recovery, depending on whether the United States takes over prosecution of a case.
Since 1954, the IRS has had its own statutory authorization to pay rewards to promote whistle-blowing. The component of the program most familiar to citizenry today is the Form 211 procedures, which is outlined in Revenue Publication 733. Pursuant to this procedure, whistleblowers who have reported underpayments of tax to the IRS may subsequently receive as reward potentially amounting to 30 percent of the amount recovered by submitting a completed Application for Reward for Original Information (Form 211), to the local IRS campus, referencing both the subject taxpayer and the information that was provided regarding the taxpayer.
Under the old system, the Form 211 procedure has had limited effect, owing in substantial measure to the historically low cap on rewards ($2 million), the absence of any provisions allowing whistleblowers to enforce their claims to rewards, and limited promotion of the program. Thus, while recoveries by the United States in whistleblower cases under the False Claims Act have been increasing exponentially since the Act was amended in 1986 (from $390,000 in 1987 to over $1.1 billion in 2005), recoveries by the IRS under its whistleblower program in recent years have not even reached $100 million (including taxes, penalties, and interest). Therefore, partly because of this disparity in numbers, the IRS has been under increasing pressure to restructure its whistleblower incentive program. In 2004, Senator Charles Grassley, Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, who was a key sponsor of the 1986 False Claims Act Amendments, proposed revisions to section 7623 of the internal Revenue Code that would have created a whistleblower framework similar in key respects to the False Claims Act. The legislation was not enacted in 2004, but the IRS had already taken notice.
FOR LIMITED TIME ONLY
YOUR
BARGAIN PRICE
$ 99.99
Click to set custom HTML